|
TOWARD A NEW PLATFORM FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
by Herb Rubenstein
CEO, Herb Rubenstein Consulting
Introduction
The political
leader of the Democratic Party in the 1990’s stated, “The
Age of Big Government is Over.” He balanced the budget and
even created a surplus. He presided over an economic boon that turned
into a bust as soon as the Republicans took over the White House.
He transformed the welfare system to require millions of people
to get jobs. He almost achieved peace in the mid-east. He was impeached
as in now ranked in the bottom third of our American presidents.
Current
Democratic Party Platform
Where is the
Democratic Party and its platform in 2002? Not just the “written
platform presented every four years at some convention.” But
where is the Democratic Party platform where it counts – in
the mind of the voter. The Democratic Party platform looks something
like this as of November 5, 2002.
- We want
to protect the American people from attack but prefer not to support
a Department of Homeland Security that cuts into valued civil
service protections of federal workers.
- We want
to stop Iraq, but we will give only lukewarm support to a President
and Secretary of State even while they are seeking the full support
of the United Nations.
- We want
to improve education, but not at the expense of trying new approaches
like vouchers since they hurt public teachers and their unions.
- We support
the environment but oppose balancing environmental harm with economic
harm.
- We support
civil rights, affirmative action and diversity but have no plan
that is consistently approved by the courts and have done little
to educate the American people about the true benefits of diversity.
- We want
better health care and prescription drug benefits for our senior
citizens, but can not figure out a way to make this happen while
soaring healthcare costs are bankrupting people as well as state,
local and federal governments.
- We support
improved transportation, but rely on pork barrel public works
projects and public transportation subsidies that do not alleviate
the gridlock faced in every major city today.
- We stand
for integrity, but run candidates who have been censored for ethical
violations until it is obvious they will lose.
- We support
adequate housing, but can not fix the public housing debacles
that plague our cities.
- We support
reducing crime, but have no plan that will result in significantly
less crime in 10 years.
- We want
tax reform, but have not presented a comprehensive tax reform
plan in recent memory.
- We want
improved government services, but have no means of holding government
workers accountable for poor services.
- We support
energy independence, but oppose energy exploration or increased
production of energy in the U.S.
- We think
social security trust fund will go bankrupt, but we have no plan
to scale it back.
- We support
the right of a mother to choose whether to have an abortion and
the government must pay for the abortion of persons eligible for
medical assistance from the government. But, the government will
not pay for the adoption of a child if the mother chooses not
to have an abortion and to put the child up for adoption.
Fifteen planks
in the platform. Fifteen “buts.” Fifteen “blanks”
with the majority of American voters. The party platform, as seen
through the eyes of the voters leaves the average voter with no
clue what the Democratic Party really stands for.
Republican
Platform
In contrast
the Republican Party platform is clear, even if it is misguided.
Several planks include:
- Stop terror,
create Department of Homeland Security.
- Topple Saddam
Hussein.
- Reduce taxes.
- Limit abortion.
- Use vouchers
to give school children a choice.
- Support
churches and faith based organizations to do more for people.
- Stand for
integrity.
- Stop unions
from closing down our seaports and their attempts to protect their
jobs from new, better, more efficient technologies.
- Free trade.
- Low interest
rates.
- Less government,
especially less federal and less regulation of business and more
privatization of government services.
- Take economic
factors into consideration when making environmental choices.
Conclusion
These twelve
Republican Party platforms are clear, concise and understood by
the majority of the American voters who vote on election day. It
is clear from comparing these two “platforms” that the
Democrats need to create a concise message to contrast with the
concise Republican message.
In this day
of soundbites, the message must be simple, clear and straight forward
and delivered by people who are genuine, authentic, sincere and
believable. That is the “Challenge of the Century” for
the Democratic Party. No “ifs,” “ands” or
“buts” about it.
back |