| 
back
to newsletter repository
June 2003
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Herb Rubenstein Consulting
HIRED TO DEVELOP LEADERSHIP STRATEGIES FOR THE INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE
Based on the
pioneering leadership development approach called, “ON BECOMING
A LEADER OF LEADERS,” Herb Rubenstein Consulting now provides leadership development
services to the Internal Revenue Service. See the article below
that forms the basis of the unique approach to leadership developed
by Herb Rubenstein Consulting.
VISIT
Herb Rubenstein Consulting’S EXPANDED WEBSITE
Our new website
has over 60 articles that can help grow your business or non-profit
organization. Please visit us at www.growth-strategies.com.
CLIENT
OF THE MONTH: INFORMATION EXPERTS, INC.
Herb Rubenstein Consulting's client
of the month is Information Experts, Inc. Information Experts was
featured in USA Today on May 19, 2003 and in the Washington Post
in June, 2003. Information Experts is an award-winning strategic
communications firm specializing in the development, implementation,
and ROI measurement of communications strategies and information
products.
Through the
integration of its instructional design, marketing communications,
and strategy divisions, Information Experts has created innovative,
communications strategies and products for numerous Fortune 500
organizations, including AMS, Unisys, Oracle, AOL, Nextel, Cisco,
Nortel, Cable & Wireless, Mercedes-Benz, Marsh, Chick Fil-A,
AllFirst Bank, VeriSign, and many other industry leaders. Information
Experts is expanding into the federal marketplace. It is on the
GSA schedule and has been certified as an 8(a) company. To learn
more about Information Experts, see www.informationexperts.com.
ARTICLE
THE
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LEADERS AND "LEADERS OF LEADERS"
Article
by Herb Rubenstein
President and Founder, Herb Rubenstein Consulting
Introduction
Trustee Leadership.
Total Leadership. Assigned Leadership. Connective Leadership. Balanced
Leadership. Muscular Leadership. Toxic Leadership. Fusion Leadership.
Complexity Leadership. Character Based Leadership. Emergent Leadership.
Directive Leadership. Participative Leadership. Ethical Leadership.
Principled Leadership. Team Leadership. Achievement Oriented Leadership.
Supportive Leadership. Charismatic Leadership. Wholehearted Leadership.
Level 5 Leadership. Authentic Leadership. Leadership Development.
Leadership Training. Executive Development. Team Building. Coaching.
Situational Leadership. Principle Centered Leadership. Values Centered
Leadership. Inclusive Leadership. Servant Leadership. Transactional
Leadership. Transformational Leadership. Enlightened Leadership.
Leadership at Every Step. Leading Change. Values Based Leadership.
Continuous Leadership. Rational Leadership. Visionary Leadership.
Strategic Leadership. Virtual Leadership. Integrated Leadership.
Institutionalized Leadership. Collaborative Leadership. Appreciative
Leadership. Leadership as a Process. Proactive Leadership. Generative
Leadership. Revolutionary Leadership. Unnatural Leadership. Empowering
Leadership. Leadership by Example. Organizational Leadership. Operational
Leadership. Innovative Leadership. Creative Leadership. Synergistic
Leadership. Entrepreneurial Leadership. Steward Leadership. Military
Leadership. Inspired Leadership. Leaders Building Leaders. Leading
Upward. Tomorrow Leader. Quantum Leadership. Alpha Leadership. Lead
by Design. Results Based Leadership. Trickle Up Leadership. Leaders
to Leaders. Formative Leadership. Distributive Leadership. Integral
Leadership. Cross Border Leadership. Invisible Leadership. Social
Leadership. Contributory Leadership.
These are just
some (81) of the labels or brands currently in vogue in the leadership
industry today. Many of these labels describe forms of leadership
or forms of leadership training offered in the current marketplace.
This article takes a new look at leadership far different from any
of those listed above. Our work with companies and non-profit organizations
over the past two decades has shown us that there is an important,
even critical distinction between being a "leader" and
being a "leader of leaders." In this article, I suggest
that the skills, competencies, aptitudes, values, decision making
approaches, strengths, daily roles and job descriptions are radically
different for the two separate categories of "leaders"
and "leaders of leaders."
Just as Warren
Bennis defined the differences between leaders and managers (On
Becoming a Leader), this article begins to identify the real differences
between the people who fit into the category we call "leaders"
and the category we call "leader of leaders." I will use
three examples of people who clearly fit into the category of "leaders
of leaders." Many other examples exist both today and historically.
In order to
introduce what I mean by "leaders of leaders," it is important
to give a working definition of what a "leader" does and
what a "leader of leader" does.
A Leader
Is a Person or Group of People Who:
- Identifies
a significant gap between what exists today and an improved state
that can created in the future (Vision)
- Understands
enough about the causes of why the current state is the way it
is so they can know which resources to gather and what forces
to apply to promote the new solution (Grounding)
- Identifies
and communicates a clear, achievable and understandable path toward
improving the current situation (Direction)
- Identifies
the exact combination of resources (capital, people, innovation,
techniques, etc.) needed to bring about the desired result (Feasibility
Planning)
- Builds the
organizational capacity to achieve the desired result (Developer)
- Gathers
and organizes all of these resources by taking into account the
economics, logistics, legal and other requirements necessary to
successfully deploy these resources (Collaboration)
- Oversees
the project and management plan (including budget) insuring that
the resources used are gathered and deployed in the optimal order
and amount (Efficiency)
- Achieves
through leadership an improvement that people can see and identify
with consistent or better than the initial improvement that was
first identified by the leader (Success)
- Rewards
the people (salary, acknowledgement, etc.), the capital (profit
or stay with budget) and all resources associated with the project
so that they would want to work with that leader again (Caretaker)
- Identifies
a new gap between a current situation and a desired outcome (Vision)
This is what
a leader does. "Leaders of leaders" do not do what leaders
do. They do not do the things listed in numbers 1-10 above when
they are acting as "leaders of leaders."
A Leader
of Leaders is a Person or Group of People Who:
- Sees a series
or class of problems or gaps between the current situation and
a desired state of affairs (Broad Vision)
- Identifies
and develops workable solutions or improvements to the entire
set of problems by developing rules, principles, ways of thinking,
innovations and responses that address the entire class of problems,
challenges and identifies gaps that need to be fixed (Systems
Solutions)
- Creates
a platform by writing, speaking and effectively communicating
their innovations and solutions so that other leaders can use
to address entire classes of problems (Platform Builder)
- Creates
a communication structure that gets the leader of leaders' message
out to leaders and followers in a consistent and reliable manner
(Manages the Conversation)
- Creates
a relationship with leaders so that leaders adopt the leaders
of leaders' platform and begin using the new solutions, innovations
of the leader of leaders to address problems and classes of problems
(Enrollment)
- Creates a
communication system that ensures that the leader of leaders gets
regular, systematic feedback from these leaders and followers
using the platform and secures information to inform the leader
of leaders as to what works and does not work regarding the leaders
of leaders' platform (Builds and Feeds the Feedback System)
- Uses this
feedback to improve the platform, the solutions, the principles
and rules of the leader of leaders so that the future writings
and teachings become a better foundation upon which leaders and
followers can use and turn to for answers and guidance (Constant
Improvement)
- Monitors
how leaders and followers are applying the platform, teachings
and innovations to ensure that the use is both widespread and
consistent with the leaders of leaders' vision and ideas about
how to achieve improvements (Overseer)
- Takes decisive
action when the platform is misused to prevent future problems
(Guardian)
- Sees a new
series or classes of problems to solve and develops a new platform
or expands the current platform (Broad Vision)
The
Distinction Between A Leader and A Leader of Leaders
The basic duties
and responsibilities of a leader differ greatly from those duties
and responsibilities of a leader of leaders. The major distinction
between a leader and leader of leaders is best exemplified by the
fact that the leader of leaders develops a platform from which the
leader of leader leads. That platform lets the world, the country,
the state, the organization, the company or the family know how
that leader would respond to a given situation. Leaders of leaders
make sure that his or her platform is well known, understood and
followed by those he or she leads. Therefore, when a situation arises
and a leader or follower looks for guidance, that leader or follower
looks to the leader of leaders' platform, teachings, writings, speeches,
solutions, innovations, guidance, principles and examples, in order
to figure out how that leader of leaders would have wanted that
leader or follower to respond to improve the situation at hand and
the world at large.
Today, leaders
of leaders can lead millions of followers and thousands of leaders
who in turn, use the leaders of leaders' platform to lead these
millions. No leader of leader can respond to the millions of questions
that leaders and followers would ask in response to specific situations.
Therefore, developing and communicating that platform, that set
of rules, principles, solutions, innovations, examples, and ideas
in writing or in some other form of tangible, efficiently repeatable
format is one of the most critical elements of becoming a successful
leader of leaders.
Leaders of leaders
must readily learn from those they lead. When the leader of leaders
sets forth a platform, a principle, a rule, an approach to solving
a class of problems or a vision of what the future should be, the
true leader of leaders, must seek honest feedback regarding what
works and what does not work regarding their platform from those
they lead. The leader of leaders must act decisively in changing,
correcting and improving their platform upon being notified that
what they have communicated to the world as the path, the way, the
solution is not improving the world.
Case
Studies
After Howard
T. Prince, II returned from service in the U.S. Army in Viet Nam
he earned two of the most honored awards attainable by an Army man.
He became a Brigadier General in 1990 and received the Distinguished
Service Award. When he began his leadership development work for
the Army in 1978 as Professor and Head of the Department of Behavioral
Sciences and Leadership at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point,
New York, he realized he had much work to do in the aftermath of
the Viet Nam war. While at West Point, Dr. Prince was the principal
architect of both graduate and undergraduate leadership programs
and was instrumental in reshaping leader development throughout
the U.S. Army.
Dr. Prince knew
that the Viet Nam war had a profound, negative effect on Army leadership
throughout the ranks all the way from the top down to the cadet
level at West Point. Understanding that the situation was very serious,
gave Dr. Prince an enormous opportunity since he was not only was
a leader, he was a leader of leader. By being a "leader of
leaders," he brought with him to his Professorship, a "platform"
that include the highest ideals of service, integrity, demand for
accomplishment and accountability. Most importantly, his platform
included honor, the honor of service, the honor of serving well
and the honor of doing a difficult job meticulously when the environment
around you is anything but meticulous.
Though living
and teaching his platform (which was surely shaped by the leadership
training he had received in the Army, he led the charge to re-instill
this "ethic" (or as we prefer to call it "a platform")
into Army leadership training from the cadet level through the highest
ranks of the military. From his days at the Army war college he
learned The Uniform Code of Military. He knew his duty when he had
the difficult task of interviewing 152 cadets at West Point who
were expelled in a cheating scandal and he knew he had to reinvent
a comprehensive leadership development program and a leadership
culture in the Army where such a scandal could never occur again.
Through Dr. Prince's leadership, his platform, and his ability to
create courses to teach leadership and develop leaders, Dr. Prince's
platform became again the Army's platform. It became the platform
of every cadet that graduated from West Point while Dr. Prince was
"on the watch" through 1990. His work shows the power
of one man to see the challenges, identify the problems without
sugar coating them and using his knowledge to build what needed
to be built in the army. And his work and his platform continued
after he left West Point through his service as Dean of the Jepsen
School of Leadership Studies
of the University of Richmond and the Director of the Center for
Ethical Leadership of the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs
of the University of Texas at Austin.
Soon after Dick
Brown took over as CEO of EDS he realized that EDS would not meet
the analysts' earnings expectations. He immediately convened meetings
to develop a plan to cut costs, the typical leader's response to
short term earnings problems. Meetings were held and discussions
seemed to take forever. Then Dick sent an email to everyone at EDS.
Just sending an email to all 130,000 employees at EDS was no small
task since EDS used six different email systems. Dick made sure
that this problem was fixed so he could communicate whenever he
wanted with every employee at EDS. His memo was simple and to the
point. He told EDS employees of the earnings challenge and then
asked each employee to identify a way that EDS could save $1,000
and to let him know what they recommended and how they would accomplish
it. It worked. Millions were saved virtually overnight. Dick created
the platform that allowed all 130,000 people to work on a goal simultaneously.
And created the system where he could communicate with them and
they could communicate with him and give him feedback. And then
Dick immediately focused on improving revenues which he understood
required improving customer satisfaction.
The tale of
J.C. Penny's is different. Allen Questrom is Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and when he took over as CEO, J.C. Penny was languishing.
The prevailing approach to management was decentralized, with the
store managers making buying, advertising and charitable contribution
decisions. The result of this decentralization was that the "brand"
of J.C. Penny was not uniformly presented to the world. Buying and
other management decisions reflected more of the personal style
of the store managers than the higher ups at J.C. Penny. Allen made
a decision. He decided to centralize everything and took the power
away from the store managers in the short run so that the central
office could promote a consistent brand, create a philanthropic
set of donations that furthered J.C. Penny's message and made buying
decisions more uniform. In just a few quarters, Allen's new platform
has transformed J.C. Penny's. In May, 2002 its earnings report exceeded
analysts' expectations by 5 cents per share. Allen showed how he
was a leader of leaders by creating a new platform, communicating
that platform, taking the reins and getting his store managers to
adopt the new platform and produce great results in a short time.
The non-profit
world has its leaders of leaders. Mario Morino has done two things
that fit him into this category. First, he created "netpreneur.org"
an organization that gave the Washington, DC area the "social
infrastructure" to become a new economy powerhouse very rapidly.
He created the organization and set forth its rules, thus bringing
together many leaders of the economy to begin to work together for
the betterment of the area's economy and the many businesses located
in the region. Mario set forth to create new rules, a new paradigm,
for philanthropy, called "venture philanthropy." Mario's
platform that is taking hold throughout the United States is that
foundations "invest" rather than make grants, must support
their "grantees" with managerial support and that grantees
should be entrepreneurial and should measure the efforts they actually
deliver with the funds they receive and measure the impact of their
efforts in improving communities and attacking social problems.
Mario set out to improve the entire philanthropic industry, addressed
a large class of issues the industry was facing and has created
a framework to get feedback from the industry to improve his social
venture philanthropy crusade.
Creating
Leaders of Leaders
If this distinction
is valid, that there are significant differences between what a
leader does and what a leader of leaders does, then there is another
problem. We have no system to train people to be leaders of leaders.
Basically, the multi-billion dollar leadership industry, with some
exceptions, has overlooked this distinction and is not developing
the curriculum or tools necessary to train the next generation of
leaders of leaders. It is the intention of this article to be a
small start in creating this new curriculum.
Biographical
Information
Herb Rubenstein
is an attorney and the CEO of Herb Rubenstein Consulting, a leadership
and management consulting firm. He is co-author of Breakthrough,
Inc. – High Growth Strategies for Entrepreneurial Organizations
(Prentice Hall/Financial Times, 1999). His email address is herb@herbrubenstein.com
and he can be reached at (301) 718-4200 in Bethesda, Maryland or
(202) 236-7626 in Washington, D.C.
back |